
So I just watched the first episode of the new show Motive and I wanted to talk with you about the probability of it being a success.
First, blond detectives hardly ever work out well on tv. I can't be the only one who noticed that all successful female leads in police shows have brown hair or dye it red! Think Beckett in Castle, Megan Hunt in Body of Proof, Dr. Brennan in Bones... Covert Affairs and Fringe don't count because blond spies are considered more attractive and Fringe is more of the Science Fiction type of series. Cold Case might be an exception but I personnaly never even watched the show so I can't say. Plus isn't that a "Team" type of show where it focuses on the lives of everyone involved in the investigation? Like, the CSIs and Criminal Minds.
Second, I didn't like the way the story is told, with the killer and the victim known from the beginning. I guess that and the many flashbacks kind of ruin the surprise. I thought they found the killer pretty easily. Essentially, all they did was go to a crime scene where they listened to a crying widow and opened a closet. After that they searched for the title the killer called himself in the police databases and found out it was a robbery gone wrong. Somehow they ended up at a party (I don't understand who was the guy they were looking for there) and met a Nervous Guy. They took the prints of a Lying Witness and interrogated his best friend (The Nervous Guy) about his whereabouts. The Lying Witness is framed and, of course, the Female Detective thinks there's something weird about the whole thing. And that's another thing : she says he didn't have any motive but they had already established that the killer was a panicked robber! Then she remembers suddenly that the crazy dog at the scene should have attacked the killer and deduces that the dog knew the killer. Doesn't look like they did much of anything to catch the killer.
Third, a lot of little things bothered me. for exemple:
1) The Partner is doing an interrogation and he is wearing an open shirt that kind of clashes with the pristine white room.
2) The Detective makes the reasonable assumption that the killer is a teenager but it's difficult to understand where she got that from because they don't explain it. Here is what we got from her : The Robber does it for thrill = the thrill he gets from not following the rules = My son is like that! = That's it! It simply must be a teenager then! Here is her thought process: The Robber does it for thrill = the thrill he gets from not following the rules = My son is like that! = Wait. Bored Thrill Seeker. Thwarting Autority.The victim is a teacher. My, my... sounds like our killer is a teenager!
Fourth, what, exactly is her relationship with her Partner? At first I thought they were the regular type of Male-Female partnership you see on tv: friends who trust eachother but still have minor differences of opinion that causes bickering. So the "are you two fighting again?" comment didn't make me think they were more. It's when they talked about getting ribs at the end of the episode that I got confused.
My Final Word on this show is that, unless they clear things up a bit, Motive is not going to make it.


